There’s something profoundly unsettling about watching grief take form — not metaphorically, but literally. In "The Thing With Feathers," that form is a hulking, feathered creature: part nightmare, part companion, part mirror. It emerges from the imagination of a broken man, and yet it feels as if it was always there, circling him, waiting. Adapted from Max Porter’s poetic novel Grief Is the Thing with Feathers, Dylan Southern’s film is less a story than a psychological haunting — a reckoning with sorrow so consuming that it begins to mutate into its own living thing.
Benedict Cumberbatch plays “Dad,” a man who has lost his wife in an accident and now stumbles through the half-life that follows. He’s a father, but barely functioning as one. The domestic rituals of care and normality feel alien to him; every gesture, every word to his children carries the tremor of someone pretending to still belong to the living. Cumberbatch has always been a technically immaculate actor, but here he seems almost porous — as if the grief itself is breathing through him. His every silence, his every falter feels true, because it isn’t performance anymore. It’s paralysis.
And then there’s the Crow. Voiced by David Thewlis and physically embodied through Eric Lampaert’s performance beneath Nicola Hicks’s extraordinary design, this creature crashes into the household like an uninvited guest who somehow already knows where everything belongs. It taunts Dad for being a “sad mad dad,” belittles his sorrow, claws at his self-pity — and yet, perversely, also becomes his only companion. Thewlis’s voice balances mockery and tenderness, the way grief itself does when it begins to both destroy and sustain you. The Crow is not evil, but it is merciless. It’s grief in its rawest form: deranged, poetic, self-aware, and relentless.
Some critics have taken issue with the film’s tone — its abrupt shifts from quiet family drama to surreal horror, from poetic reflection to grotesque absurdity. But that, to me, is exactly the point. Grief doesn’t move in clean emotional arcs; it’s volatile, unpredictable, cruelly inconsistent. You can be crying one moment and laughing the next, terrified of your memories and yet desperate to relive them. The tonal dissonance isn’t a flaw — it’s fidelity. It’s how mourning actually feels when you’re living it. And that’s why I find the criticism about “imbalance” almost missing the emotional truth. If you’ve ever been through the chaos of loss, you’ll know that this instability isthe reality. The film dares to be messy, and it’s all the more human for it.
Southern’s visual approach mirrors that claustrophobic interiority. The film’s 4:3 aspect ratio boxes its characters into their grief, while the lighting seems to flicker between memory and nightmare. It’s as though the entire house is alive — an organism of sorrow, pulsating with what’s been lost. There are moments of striking beauty, too, where the boundaries between the real and the imagined dissolve completely, and you realise that maybe grief doesn’t haunt us from outside at all — maybe it lives in our skin.
Cumberbatch’s scenes with his sons are among the most painful. You can sense the children’s confusion — they’re old enough to see their father disappearing, too young to name it. The Crow, in its twisted way, becomes a presence that fills the void left by the mother’s death — a stand-in, a shadow, a guide. The ambiguity of its role — villain or saviour, demon or therapist — keeps the film alive with tension. It’s the manifestation of a mind refusing to let go, the voice that both breaks you and drags you back from the edge.
There’s a moment in the film — brief but devastating — where the Crow says something that isn’t cruel, or sardonic, but gentle. It’s as though it’s finally tired of tormenting him. And that’s when it hits you: this whole thing, this surreal pageant of feathers and fury, has been about learning to live with grief, not outrun it. The Crow doesn’t want to leave because grief never does — it simply changes shape.
For me, "The Thing With Feathers" isn’t just about mourning; it’s about the fight against despair. It’s about that fragile point between remembering and being consumed. The film has the courage to be uneven, to lurch between tones, to feel contradictory and strange — because grief itself is contradictory and strange. It’s not comforting cinema, and it’s not designed to be. But it’s honest, poetic, and raw in a way that few films about loss ever manage to be.
I walked away from it thinking how rare it is to see a film that understands pain not as a problem to be solved, but as a presence to be survived. Southern, Cumberbatch, and Thewlis together capture the unsteady rhythm of continuing to live after the world has stopped. "The Thing With Feathers" doesn’t just depict grief — it lets you feel its weight, its absurdity, its humour, its horror. It gives it wings.
And in doing so, it tells a difficult, necessary truth: grief will always have feathers, because it never truly lands.
9/10
Add comment
Comments